-
A Black Hills mining company says it’s found a “robust” potential deposit of minerals in the northern Black Hills.
-
South Dakota House lawmakers are advancing a bill that prohibits liquid carbon dioxide pipeline companies from using eminent domain to complete its projects. Canton Republican Karla Lems said South Dakota should be more like Minnesota—which prohibits eminent domain for carbon pipelines.
-
A South Dakota House committee is advancing a bill to ban the use of eminent domain for liquid carbon dioxide pipelines.
-
Summit Carbon Solutions is filing a lawsuit to prevent what it believes is a conflict of interest in an upcoming review with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.
-
Summit Carbon Solutions is trying to soothe concerns over a proposed CO2 pipeline in a series public input meetings. But some are still not convinced by the company’s promises.
-
Deep sea research is taking place over 1,500 miles from the coastline. At South Dakota Mines, researchers have one big question – how can we turn seaweed into jet fuel?
-
The state Public Utility Commissioners set Summit Carbon Solution’s application maximum filing fee. Parties interested in intervening in the upcoming Summit hearing may have tighter restrictions.
-
The SD Public Utilities Commission sets six public input meetings on Summit Carbon Solution’s reapplication to construct a carbon dioxide pipeline in the state.
-
After a few years of remaining stable, the Pierre City Commission opts to increase utility rates for electricity, wastewater and water by 3%.
-
The 8th Circuit Court of appeals is weighing whether setbacks for carbon dioxide pipelines in two Iowa counties are allowed. Summit Carbon Solutions argues the safety standards for pipelines that carry hazardous materials are regulated by the federal government.